Elaborated Design Plan for Web 2.0 Foundations
Web 2.0 Foundations is a semester long secondary school course focused on participatory co-learning in multisited contexts with the goal of elevating the understanding of ones potential for creating positive learning outcomes in blended learning contexts. Focused on building a personal learning network for networked research the course Web 2.0 Foundations is situated within the middle grounds of formal and non-formal learning environments and relies on connectivist and constructivist pedegogy. This intervention has been designed to better understand how a learning community in a traditional rural school setting responds and contributes to the conversation on adapted (Blended/Connected learning environments) while also achieving pertinent school based and national standards.
Needs Analysis and Survey of Literature
The controlled curricular structures of the “school” are not adequate to meet the challenges faced by the worlds young people in the twenty-first century. Further, the one hundred year absence of systemic change in education provides an environment that is ripe for what Zuboff (2010) has called a “Mutation”: modes of learning “that create value by offering [learners] individualized learning that express a convergence of technological capabilities and the values associated with individual self-determination”. Zuboff’s argument is cogent in education as only now, in 2010 do we see some meaningful consensus on educational change beginning to solidify, for instance around the need for computers in learning to address the 21st century skills of finding leveraging, synthesizing, collaborating and problem solving with information (Hayes Jacobs ed. 2010, Bonk, 2009, Davidson and Goldberg, 2009). This new and still growing consensus occurs while the bulk of school and curricular policy remains static (Apple, 2010, Darling Hammond, 2010). The realization that educational systems are unresponsive to needed change raises the importance of new learning environments when considering that our world systems are in decline (Burns et.al). Our interdependent world calls for a deliberative, culturally conscious, and collaborative generation. With this in mind the future role of education as a change agent has never been more important. Bold initiatives grounded in the seminal work of critical educators such as(James Beane, 1995,1996; Michael Apple, 1990,1996, 2009, 2010, Boulding,1988), eLearning mavericks (George Siemens, Steven Downes, Alec Couros, and Dave Cormier) As the world realizes both systemic global crisis (UN millennium Development Goals, 2010; ICISS, 2001), and the exponential growth in global connectivity, education can and must help catalyze a new global civic culture through the restructuring of how we provide learning to our world.
Systemic Social, Cultural and Organizational Influences and Constraints on Design.
This design exists within a traditional school system setting atypical to Committee of Ten Standardization yet within the current environment of standardization and standards based reform (RISC and MCCL). This environment is both exciting and intimidating to the researcher. The learners involved in this study are primarily rural western European Americans at or around the poverty line to middle and upper middle class. The learning environment numbers from 150-200 young people across a 60 mile district. ALL 2012-2013 participants are local to one high school and number at 75. Strong small rural community ideologies exist with conservative, pragmatic and progressive manifestations creating an environment of uncertainty for students.
The Design work for Web 2.0 Foundations elevates, connectivist, constructivist, and open learning theory. The course’s mission is to connect individuals to the world through place based and international studies that are applied to an individuals interests, passions and quest for serving their local and world communities. Web 2.0 Foundations is made up of young people who co-develop their own program with a Teacher/Mentor Networked Learning Mentors (Via Twitter, Google +),and other local and international community members. At every stage of research, design, Web 2.0 Foundations supports individual learners while also connecting those individuals face to face and virtual project based learning cohorts that have can have a mission to solve local, regional, and global problems that effect our interdependent world.
The intended audience for this design research are both young and old existing within the academy and in informal and formal learning environments outside of the academy. The research is meant to have impact on the theory, design and implementation of new learning environments at the middle level and secondary level in private, public and quasi public/private institutions. It is my hope that young people find this research accessible so they may take a greater role in the design of education.
Task analysis will be used to better understand daily patterns of learning, Contextual Analysis will be used to situate the study in local and global educational contexts, Audience and Expert Review will be used for internal and external reflection and iteration and Ethnographic methods (specifically ethnographic fieldnotes) will be used for recording the learning process. Participatory design will be used to support learner motivation and participation.
Participants who engage in Web 2.0 Foundations are introduced to an integrated project based learning process’s that leverages internet based learning systems, Mobile Learning and collaborative project based learning. Learning modalities are face to face and blended with synchronous and asynchronous learning over a four month period.
The project is situated amidst multiple learning targets both institutional and informal. Local and international institutional learning targets make up the institutional learning targets and include NETS-S, Local 21st Century Benchmarks, and adapted common core requirements. Wider learning targets include effective connectivism and networked learning practice.
Design Strategies and Principles
- Context evaluation, content sequencing, fostering interaction with an additional emphasis on addressing knowledge as existing in networks and learning as developing and forming diverse, multi‐faceted networks (Siemens 2008)
- Generate Value for Learners
- Curate a Gathering of human experiences and Artifacts that are synthetically processed
- Use of Empathy
- Agile communication of findings during design process “data as narrative”
- Contribute solutions to a broad learning community
Apple, M., Au, W., and Gandin, A.L., eds.(2009). Routledge International Handbook of Critical Education. New York, Routledge
Apple, M., ed.(2010). Global Crises, Social Justice, and Education. New York, Routledge.
Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003) The Role of Design in Research: The Integrative Learning Design Framework. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 21-24.
Bonk, Curtis J. (2009). The world is open: How web technology is revolutionizing education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The Flat World and Education: How America’s Commitment to Equity Will Determine Our Future.New York: Teachers College: Columbia Press.
Downes, S. (2005, December 22). An introduction to connective knowledge. Stephen’s Web. http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=33034
Downes, S. (2006, October 16). Learning networks and connective knowledge. Instructional Technology Forum: Paper 92. http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper92/paper92.html
Davidson, C.N., Goldberg, D.T. ( 2009) The Future of Learning Institutions in the Digital Age. Cambridge: MIT Press. http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=11841
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R.I., Shaw, L.L. (1995) Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayes Jacobs, H. (2010). Curriculum 21: Essential Education for a Changing World. Alexandria: ASCD.
Siemens, G. (2008a). About: Description of connectivism. Connectivism: A learning theory for today’s learner, website. http://www.connectivism.ca/about.html
Siemens. G. (2006a). Knowing knowledge. KnowingKnowledge.com Electronic book. www.knowingknowledge.com
Siemens, G. (2005, August 10). Connectivism: Learning as Network Creation. e-Learning Space.org website. http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/networks.htm
References informing overall design stage.
Bell, P. (2004). On the theoretical breadth of design-based research in education. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 243-253.
Blomberg, Jeannette, et. al. (1993). Ethnographic Field Methods And Their Relation To
Design, In Participatory Design: Principles And Practices, Schuler, Douglas, Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, 123-155.
Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1998). Designing a community of young learners: Theoretical and practical lessons. In N. M. Lambert & B. L. McCombs (Eds.), How students learn: Reforming schools through learner-centered education (pp. 153-186). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
Cole, M. (1996). Creating model activity systems,Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline (pp. 257-285). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. Cole, M. (2001, January 19-20). Sustaining Model Systems of Educational Activity: Designing for the Long haul. Paper Presented at Symposium
Honoring the Work of Ann Brown, Berkeley, California. (Accessed online on 15 November 2001 at http://lchc.ucsd.edu/People/MCole/ann.html). Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences,13(1), 15-42.
Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
diSessa, A., & Cobb, P. (2009). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13:1, 77—103.
Nasir, N. S., Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Lee, C. D. (2006). Learning as a cultural process. In K.Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (1st ed.) (pp. 489-504). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richey, R.C., Klein, J.D.,(2007). Design and Development Research. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Shavelson, R. J., Phillips, D. C., Towne, L., & Feuer, M. J. (2003). On the science of education design studies. Educational researcher, 32(1), 25-28.